top of page
Search

Can Big Consulting Still Pass the VRIO Test in the Age of AI?


There’s been a lot of discussion lately about whether big consulting firms like McKinsey are losing their edge in the era of AI. Current and former McKinsey folks are quick to defend the firm’s relevance — essentially pushing back on the idea that AI makes them obsolete. As a strategy wonk (and boutique consultant myself), I couldn’t resist putting that claim to the test using a classic framework from Strategy 101: VRIO.


In plain language, VRIO asks four questions about a company’s “secret sauce”:


1)      Valuable – Does it actually help you win or solve real problems?

2)      Rare – Do only a few players have it, or does everyone have access?

3)      Inimitable – Is it hard for others to copy or substitute in a serious way?

4)      Organized – Is the company set up to fully leverage it and scale it?


If the answer is “yes” to all four, you’ve likely got something that can give you a durable edge. So, how does McKinsey’s consulting model stack up on VRIO in a world where AI is everywhere?



1. Valuable: Still yes, but not by default

Historically, McKinsey’s value came from things like:


  • Access to elite talent

  • Sophisticated frameworks and analyses

  • Credibility with boards and governments



Today, thanks to AI, a big piece of that analytical value isn’t so special anymore. A smart prompt (plus your own internal talent) can now crank out:


  • Market maps and competitive landscapes

  • Industry trend analyses and summaries

  • Strategy deck outlines with the usual “options” and recommendations


McKinsey can still add value, but a thick slide deck no longer carries automatic value. Clients won’t be wowed by analysis alone, because much of it can be generated quicker and cheaper with AI. More of the value now has to come from actually implementing changes, managing organizational change, and building trust – not just delivering analysis.


2. Rare: The thinking isn’t rare anymore

McKinsey’s core thinking is built on strategy and economics frameworks that have been standard for decades. Those same ideas are everywhere now – they’re taught in every MBA program, fill countless business books and case studies, and are baked into every major AI tool. Once ChatGPT (and other models) can surface the same handful of strategy frameworks in seconds, the “McKinsey way of thinking” stops being special.

 

What is still rare about McKinsey? A few things, like:


  • Very senior-level access in governments and Fortune 500s

  • The signaling power of the McKinsey brand (it still means something to many)

  • A deep alumni network that opens doors

 


So yes, the McKinsey name and connections still carry some exclusivity. But the actual content of their thinking is no longer rare at all – everyone now has access to the same frameworks and data. The firm’s intellectual toolkit isn’t a unique asset in the age of ubiquitous AI knowledge.


3. Inimitable: The style is copyable, the relationships aren’t

McKinsey used to feel almost impossible to imitate. They had a distinct “machine” for producing polished strategies and slides. Today, however, the surface-level style is easy to copy:


  • Slide formats, jargon, and storytelling techniques can be replicated by training AI (or by any ex-consultant with a YouTube channel teaching “how to build McKinsey slides”).

  • Boutique firms and in-house strategy teams can now look and sound very “McKinsey-like” at a fraction of the cost.



What remains hard to imitate is the deeper stuff:


  • Decades of reputation with certain top clients

  • Embedded relationships at the highest levels of large organizations

  • An internal culture that shapes how employees think and work (the famed “McKinsey training”)


In short, the superficial elements of McKinsey’s model can be cloned by others (often with help from AI). The deep social capital – the trust and access built over decades – is still unique. However, that deep advantage only matters in client segments that still value the traditional big-firm approach. Many newer clients might care more about results and speed than a legacy reputation.


4. Organized: Is McKinsey built to harness AI?

The last part of VRIO is often overlooked: even if you have valuable, rare, hard-to-copy resources, are you organized to fully use them in a changing environment? For McKinsey, this is the real pressure point. They need to ask themselves:


  • Can a partner-led, high-fee, pyramid model work when AI takes over a big chunk of the grunt work junior consultants used to do?

  • Can they redesign projects around AI tools without undermining their billable hours and revenue model?

  • Can they shift from the mindset of “we have the answer” to “we’ll help you co-create the answer using your data, your people, and AI”?



McKinsey is investing heavily in AI (they’d be foolish not to), but there’s a built-in tension. The more they use AI to boost efficiency and reduce project timelines, the more clients will question paying McKinsey’s premium fees. If an AI-driven analysis takes 1/5th the time, will clients accept the same six- or seven-figure price tag? The firm’s organization and business model will have to adapt fundamentally to avoid pricing itself out of the market.


So, does McKinsey pass the VRIO test in the AI era?

Here’s the rough verdict:


  • Valuable: Partly – McKinsey can be valuable, but not by default and not purely for analysis.

  • Rare: The ideas and frameworks aren’t rare anymore; only the brand and high-level access are.

  • Inimitable: The PowerPoint style and analyses are easy to imitate now; the long-built network and relationships are not.

  • Organized: This is the big question mark. McKinsey’s traditional structure was built for a pre-AI world, and it’s unclear if they can fully reorganize for the new one.


In other words, AI has punched some serious holes in Big Consulting’s old VRIO story. The sustainable edge in consulting going forward won’t be “we have the proprietary framework or the smartest guys in the room.” The edge will come from things that AI can’t easily replicate, such as:


  • Unique, human-centric problem solving models that aren’t already in the AI training data (truly fresh thinking tailored to each client).

  • Deep, domain-specific expertise and local knowledge that give context to solutions (not just generic best practices).

  • Real human relationships and trust, and the ability to guide organizations through the messy, human side of change.


Those are the kinds of advantages AI can’t copy – the kind rooted in human experience, creativity, and trust. And that’s exactly where smaller, more focused firms have an opportunity to shine. While the giants grapple with reinventing themselves, nimble boutiques (yes, like my own Value Engine LLC) can double down on the human touch, flexibility, and innovative thinking. In the age of AI, being big and old-fashioned is looking less like an advantage and more like a liability.


Bottom line: McKinsey’s not doomed, but the source of consulting value is shifting. If you’re choosing a consulting partner in 2025, it might be time to look beyond the old brand name and ask the VRIO questions yourself. You may find that a fresher, more agile approach wins the day.

 
 
 

5 Comments


Nicole Patague
Nicole Patague
Dec 20, 2025

What really stuck with me was the focus on the “organized” part of VRIO. A lot of consulting models were built around long timelines, billable hours, and junior work, and AI kind of breaks all of that. From a student perspective, this made the strategy feel less about having the “perfect” answer and more about whether an organization is actually set up to move fast and adapt. It made me rethink what is in store for the future workforce.

Like

Tyler Freiberg
Tyler Freiberg
Dec 19, 2025

This article made me rethink how valuable big consulting firms really are in the age of AI, especially through the use of the VRIO framework. The point that stood out most to me was that while McKinsey’s brand and relationships may still be rare, the actual strategy frameworks and analysis are no longer unique since AI can now generate similar insights quickly. I agree that this shifts the real value of consulting toward trust, implementation, and human judgment rather than polished slide decks. It also raises an interesting question: if AI continues to speed up analysis, will clients still be willing to pay premium prices for traditional consulting models, or will they expect something fundamentally different?

Like

Jazlen Lucas
Jazlen Lucas
Dec 19, 2025

One idea that stood out in the article is the application of the VRIO framework to big consulting firms, showing how once-valuable advantages like proprietary frameworks and polished slide decks are becoming less rare and less defensible as AI can now generate similar outputs quickly and cheaply. I agree with this assessment, because many clients today are less impressed by analysis alone and more concerned with whether consultants can help them actually implement change, build internal capability, and navigate messy organizational realities. The article raises an important question about whether large consulting firms are truly reorganizing around these new sources of advantage—such as trust, judgment, and change leadership or if they are simply layering AI tools on top of outdated…

Like

lieud
Dec 17, 2025

Danny Lieu-

While reading this article, the idea that stood out to me was how AI is making the usual advantages of big consulting firms like McKinsey less special. I think this makes sense because a lot of the reports and frameworks they used to sell can now be done really fast with AI. What I found most interesting is that the real advantage now comes from human skills like building trust, keeping relationships, and helping companies actually make changes. It makes me think that smaller, quicker firms might do better than the big ones by focusing on creativity and being flexible instead of just having a famous name

Like

remsmith
Dec 16, 2025

Your VRIO breakdown makes a strong case that AI has fundamentally changed what counts as an advantage in consulting, and I *mostly* agree with what you're saying. I don't think AI is a threat to good strategy work, but I do think it's a tool that shows where the value of consulting was overstated in the first place. If AI can now make clean frameworks, market maps, and strategic options in minutes, then were those outputs ever really unique or hard to copy in the first place? The illusion that insight comes from slides instead of doing things is what AI takes away. "Organized" is the part of VRIO that I think is most important. Big consulting firms were built on the…

Like
bottom of page